Main

April 11, 2009

Female Rights, Feminine Power

This week our state legislature took the entirely meaningless action of sending a memorial (official letter from the legislature) to the President and the United States Senate, asking that a U.N. Treaty pledging all signatory nations to work for gender equality be ratified by the Senate.

Meaningless because the treaty will do absolutely nothing to assure equal rights for women. The treaty has actually been around since 1979, and the United States signed it in 1980, but the Senate has not chosen to take it up. A large percentage of the nations of the world have however fully accepted the treaty, and reading the list proves quite interesting since a great many of the signatories are some of the nations most guilty of abusing their female population. Lovely places like Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, Syria, and Serbia.

Quite obviously if the treaty could have actually improved the lives of women, it would have done so by now. Afghanistan for example signed almost 30 years ago, but only the United States military has been able to keep that nation from stoning women who dare to explore sexuality to death.

It seems though that people on the left often prefer symbolism to substance, and left wing female legislators just couldn’t resist taking the opportunity to take a futile and meaningless action for the rights of women around the world.

The occasion was a visit to members of our state government by a handful of female Afghanis. Women whom some liberal female legislators could feel sorry for, could feel like they were fighting for through the very bold action of writing an official letter to the President and Senate. Of course the Afghani women made no move towards their own freedom, their visit here just as meaningless as our legislators attempt to gain them equal rights.

To a person they wore the head coverings required by the men of their country. An Afghani woman, in Afghanistan, might very well have good reason for submitting to such a requirement. Social and legal demands are placed upon them, and it is certainly not beyond the realm of possibility to think that an Afghani woman violating such a rule could be killed in the street for doing so.

They were not however in Afghanistan. They were here, in the United States, in a nation that does provide full and complete equal rights to women. (Despite what some lefty political types might believe.) There was absolutely no valid reason for them to feel required to wear such symbols of subjugation here, and I must admit that I was horribly disappointed to watch them being active participants in their own subjugation.

It disappoints me that so few women understand that equal rights for women are not gained through legislation, they are not granted by some kind of outside force. They are taken, seized by women themselves.

That is why I was so disheartened to see the head coverings. The Afghani women were counting on women here, legislators here, to help grant them rights and power in Afghanistan. They aren’t savvy enough to realize that things just don’t work that way. If they want rights, if they want power as women, they are going to have to take it. Seize it from the men who they currently allow to prevent them from having it. Anything less is just a cop out, anything less cannot work. Will these women find the freedom they seek? Never. They weren’t smart enough to realize that such freedom can only be taken by force, and they passed up a tremendous opportunity to take a safe first step by removing their head coverings while here in the good ‘ol US of A.

This post need not be all about politics though, for the same exact principals apply to female supremacy. The dominant woman doesn’t wait around for her submissive to decide how much power she may have, she takes the power she wants through force and through force of her will.

Force, and I should also mention feminine sexuality, is the key. She doesn’t ask him if he wants to play a spanking game, she dresses in what she knows will impress his cock, grabs a whip and orders him to bend over. She doesn’t wait in vain for him to begin cleaning the house after he indicates a kinky desire to do so, she draws up a specific list of chores and the schedule she expects him to keep regarding each of them, then expects them to be done. She inspects afterwards praising him when he does well, forcing him to repeat them when done poorly.

This is how female domination works. Indeed, this is how all power works.

The women from Afghanistan, as well their lefty legislative admirers, just don’t seem to understand the world. Equal rights for women in this country were not somehow magically created out of the good hearts of men. They were demanded by women. Women required that their freedom be granted and indeed it was.

The Afghani women who visited our beautiful state, and the female legislators who pushed a legislative memorial for them don’t understand the nature of power, the necessity of force, and could therefore never gain equality. The women of the late 19th and early 20th centuries who did so very much to ensure freedom for American women of today would have been ashamed of the pathetic actions and lack of understanding by those legislators who were trying to help by writing a memorial to the President and Senate.

Had it not already been granted to them by the sacrifice of those who came before, these legislators certainly could never gain equal rights for themselves, much less ever have a chance of knowing the sublime joy to be had dominating a willing submissive.

December 6, 2008

Childishness In Olympia

The old adage suggests that one should never discuss religion in public for the topic is always sure to offend. For that reason, a disclaimer:

The following post makes fun of a handful of evangelical Christians, a Rabbi, a handful of atheists, Republican legislators from the religious wing of the party, and the State Patrol. If you are easily offended by the mocking of such people and groups, you might not want to read any further. If however you find reason to be valuable, I hope you enjoy this post.

End disclaimer.

It seems that our state capitol building is attracting all manner of childish people, and childish behavior this Christmas season.

For a great many years the Association of Washington Business has put up a Christmas tree within the building, directly under the rotunda. This is for the AWB a part of their efforts to raise funds for ensuring that the needy can have a good holiday. A worthy endeavor by an important organization.

Christmas, the celebration of the birth of Jesus of Nazareth is of course a Christian holiday, so the tree is officially designated a ‘Holiday Tree’ in light of the fact that it is contained within the capitol building of a secular government.

Christmas trees are of course a pagan tradition that has been widely adopted by western Christians, but of course many people choose to ignore the fact of decorated trees pagan origins, and have come to view the Christmas tree as a part of Christianity.

One such fellow is a Rabbi. It seems he was offended by the fact that the capitol was home to a ‘Holiday Tree.’ Instead of just not looking at the tree, he decided to make a childish political statement. He put up a Menorah a couple of Christmases past. His childish decision to be offended by the ‘Holiday Tree’ was however quite minor compared to the childish behavior it inspired.

A Realtor visited the capitol building and spotted the Menorah. Instead of just not looking at the Menorah, he decided to act childish, become offended, and make a childish political statement. He put up a nativity scene that is now in it’s second year.

Republican legislators, due to the controversy surrounding the nativity scene figured out that the ‘Holiday Tree’ is actually called a holiday tree, and not a Christmas tree. One can always count upon Republican legislators from the religious wing of the party to act childish, and of course they acted perfectly true to form. Indignant calls issued forth from some legislators demanding that the ‘Holiday Tree’ be called a ‘Christmas Tree.’

At this point last year the childish behavior of everyone involved, with the exception of the AWB that just wanted to get charitable donations for kids, had made the news in a fairly big way.

An atheist from the city of Shelton saw the controversy on the news. Instead of simply shaking her head at the childish behavior of others she too decided to act childish, to get offended, and make a political statement. This resulted in the placing of a sign with an atheistic message next to the nativity scene.

Moronic disc jockeys are paid extremely well to act childish, so of course the rantings of a Seattle disc jockey inspired yet another childish person to steal the sign placed by the atheist group.

The State Patrol, a police force so incompetent that it can not stop the capitol building from being regularly spray painted, taken over by ‘anarchists,’ or even stop the atheists sign from being stolen was however competent enough to go fetch the sign from the radio station it was delivered too, and put it back up.

It’s return is now sparking more childish behavior with at least two Christian groups deciding that they are so offended by it that they must place their own sign refuting it, and host a protest at the capitol building this Sunday.

While all of this does make an interesting study in childish behavior on which one can contemplate, I do have to wonder if any of these ‘religious’ and ‘non-religious’ people are remembering the purpose of the ‘Holiday Tree’ at all.

Will even one of these offended idiots leave a donation for the AWB so that they can provide a toy or a good meal to a needy child this holiday season?

I fear not.

I fear that childish political statements are far more important to all of these childish people than the true needs of a child ever could be.

This story, and the worldwide press it is receiving is a sad commentary upon our state.

Main

Share