Great topic, Mistress Milliscent! i would be fine with being a cuck and never having sex again as long as 1, i could dress like a woman, 2, at least occasionally fluff my Woman's man/men, 3, be allowed to stroke my klit and cum. That's all i ask.

Hi Ms. Milliscent,

You are probably better informed than I on this issue but I feel that though Female Supremacist relationships exist and can work, I wonder how stable and long-lived they can be without some accommodation to the male partner's needs. Forty years is a long time for an unbalanced structure to stand. I could be wrong about this and I'm interested in hearing your views.

Best,

scott
Mrs. Kelly's Playhouse

bitch,

A cuckold is a wonderful thing to be!

Alas though, it is different from being a slave, yet so many men claim to want to be slaves.

A slave could have those things you mention taken away on a whim.

M

scott,

I think that they can work, and work well over the long term, but that they are very rare.

The male who can live in such an unbalanced way is a rare thing indeed.

That is sort of the point I was trying to make in my post, so many men claim to want to be 'no limit slaves' or whatever, but I think that very, very few truly would be fulfilled living in such a way.

I think it better for men, and the women they seek if everyone is completely honest with themselves about what exactly they are seeking.

Of course as well, a male's fundamental needs (food let's say) can not be ignored, but they can certainly be granted according to her schedule and whim. Perhaps for example his food intake is extremely limited, and the food itself extremely bland because she desires him to loose weight.

Other, non fundamental needs can be turned by the creation of fetishes.

My point though is that I think that men need to be very clear, and very careful about what it is they ask for. If they are they stand a much better chance of finding the relationship they desire, and will not hurt the woman who takes them in.

M

Dear Lady,

It is strange how you describe my thoughts, my feelings, and my attitude. It is as if we were somehow connected.

I have written the same thoughts on my blog. I wrote a book on the subject. I know the importance of separating reality from fantasy. As you said, “The male who is in a real female supremacist relationship will truly suffer and he will experience loads of unhappiness.” I have a rich fantasy. However, I am also realistic enough not to try to enter a permanent relationship based on fantasy.

Novels have been written that delve into permanency, for example, those by Chris Bellows. In his books, once the man enters the realm, there is no exit. I am not truly committed to 24/7/365 submission. One reason is that humans are fallible. As shocking as it may be, females can be fallible. It would be a tragedy to be controlled by a psychotic woman with no recourse. Based on history, there are psychotic women.

I grant that the fantasy part is great. I have also written that when the needs of people are met, all submissions can be great. Then again, reality will smack you in the face at the first unexpected opportunity, and you have no dental insurance to repair the damage. This is where I am much amused while reading blogs with and about female supremacy. A female can be supreme, and it is great. A male can submit to her, which may be a joy. As for a general rule, I’ll say, “There is none.” Find your place in this wilderness, and enjoy it while you can. Eventually things will change, and you will want out! So, men, don’t submit to permanent castration of any sort because you happen to be horny at the time. The time will come when you will need your balls, assuming you ever had them.

As for supremacy, well, some people are supreme, but the trait is not dictated by gender or, color of skin. It is a very personal trait that few people have. Meanwhile, the rest of us go on with the give and take of the game of “Dominance and Submission.”

Susan’s pet,

I too have often thought about the tremendous importance of the decision about precisely whom one would enter into a 24/7/365 female supremacist relationship with.

While I don’t worry too much about the psychotic woman (after all, in our nation, the nearest policeman absolutely guarantees a release from slavery) I do worry that the woman who receives absolute submission from another must be remarkably smart and responsible. She must be able to run his life at least as well as he is able to run his own life, if not better. For some men, that is easy. ;-) For others, that can be quite hard indeed. Nevertheless, it would be stupid to turn over ones life to someone who was incapable of running it well.

I agree with you that supremacy is not dictated by gender, or any other trait one is born with. It is attained by agreement. Eisenhower was Supreme Allied Commander by agreement of the powers involved, and implicit agreement of the men and women who followed his orders. In a like manner a female can become supreme within a relationship via agreement between herself and those who serve her.

M

a great post and so much from the heart and what you say is so true

“It is tremendously unfair for a man to promise to become the 'real' slave of a woman new to female domination or female supremacy, and then not follow through on his promise. It happens all the time, and the tremendous disappointment it brings to women keeps millions from ever again attempting to embrace their dominance.”

To this I take great discord, in that it suggests that the success or failure of the woman’s ability to dominate depends upon what promises a male does or does not make. This may be true for many women, but it is not as it must be - as women have to possess the strength of character to embrace their domination no matter what the man say, if there is any chance of them being dominant at all. The only sort of dominant whose resolve might collapse due to the weakness of a man’s resolve is a faux dominant, a woman who never was dominant in anything but name.

bdenied,

Thank you. I am pleased that you enjoyed the post!

M

alexis,

I will agree with you only insofar as she may be a faux dominant.

I disagree with you beyond that though. I don't think that she must be a faux dominant.

She could be a new dominant. She could just be considering becoming dominant. She could be trying on dominance to see how it fits.

Certainly I think that some dominants are born that way. I don't think that all are though. I think that some choose dominance.

That process of choosing can either go well or poorly, and much of it has to do with her partner, not only herself.

M

I have always encouraged my wife to have sex with as many guys as possible, and she has always been happy to accomodate. We estimate that she has screwed at least a couple of hundred guys in the past two years, and she will sometimes volunteer her "services" for group events.

jay,

As long as everyone is having fun and being safe I think it is great when we can explore our sexual desires.

M

im al 53 would love 2 be your to ilet slave sskrings@solarus.biz females needing toilet slave write

anonymous,

I'm sure that you would make a delightful toilet!

M