Female Supremacist Sex
Sex is important. I think it much more important than most people understand. Sex is a joyous celebration of life and living. Everyone needs it; everyone should have the opportunity to have truly spectacular sex.
Submissive men are no different. Men, submissive or not, need sex.
We need to remember this when we contemplate or pursue female dominated, female supremacist relationships.
Submissive men don’t need intercourse, they don’t need to masturbate, they don’t need to touch the Mistress in a sexual way at all. Many are perfect for cuckolding and extreme forms of denial.
They do however all need sex. Perhaps for such men sex becomes focused in their asses as they are penetrated and used. Perhaps for such men sex becomes their tongue as they pleasure the Mistress. Perhaps for such men sex becomes their participation in the Mistress’s cuckolding scenarios. Whatever it may be, and the possibilities are almost endless; men need sex, even those in female supremacist relationships.
Comments
Thank You Mistress Milliscent for another insightful glimpse into the complexities of sexuality. Might i add for sub men of a crossdressing persuasion, even wearing panties is sex, the feel of the lace against the pathetic sub prick now reduced to second-hand clit providing a sensation more sustained than a traditional, temporary orgasm.
Posted by: subworm | November 29, 2008 7:39 PM
subworm,
I'm glad you liked the little post.
Indeed crossdressing and other forms of gender play can be truly wonderful experiences.
M
Posted by: Milliscent | November 29, 2008 10:33 PM
service is sexual.
appreciation for the service is a Woman's prerogative, and may be shown in any number of ways.
Posted by: casey | November 30, 2008 9:39 PM
Wow very well put Ms M
Posted by: bdenied | November 30, 2008 10:54 PM
casey,
You are certainly correct, service can be sexual. Putting it in, and keeping it in that context is a great thing for both top and bottom.
M
Posted by: Milliscent | December 1, 2008 2:20 PM
bdenied,
I am pleased that you enjoyed the post, but I should also let you know that you inspired the post.
Some time ago you said something to the effect of:
denial without tease is just denial.
That thought has been rattling around my head for some time, hence the post.
M
Posted by: Milliscent | December 1, 2008 2:22 PM
Years ago while involved with a vanilla Woman who loved oral, I was allowed to worship Her anus each night that we slept together. One night I realized that my usually hard penis was not. In that definative moment I knew who and what I was.
Posted by: bbj | December 9, 2008 7:54 AM
bbj,
I presume that you didn't miss the erection a bit? That being allowed to caress her ass with your tongue was for you the ultimate bliss?
M
Posted by: Milliscent | December 10, 2008 9:47 PM
Dear M,
Thank You for Your response.
I recall this a little differently now. At first, I believed that this ‘failure to rise’ must be a fluke. But it continued to occur and I was concerned about it. I wrestled with this mentally and actually it took some time to accept that my erection was not required.
Yes, complete surrender to Her desire to use me in that way was the ultimate bliss. Unfortunately, She could not continue to explore Her power.
bbj
Posted by: bbj | December 12, 2008 8:29 AM
bbj,
Please never be concerned about a lack of 'rising to the occasion' whatever the event may be. Concern over it can very easily cause what was an interesting experience to turn into an ongoing problem.
I imagine it was exactly as you now think. A desire to give pleasure without consideration for your own pleasure.
With luck, I hope that you find another woman whom you can explore in such a way with.
M
Posted by: Milliscent | December 12, 2008 6:17 PM